Product details
- Categories: Competition Law, May 2019, Economic and Monetary Affairs
- Publisher: HART PUBLISHING
- Collection: Hart Studies in Competition Law
- ISBN: 9781509927951
- Publication Date: 18/04/2019
- Binding: Paperback
- Number of pages: 384
- Language: English
Summary
In the late 1990s, the European Commission embarked on a long process of
introducing a 'more economic approach' to EU Antitrust law. One by
one, it reviewed its approach to all three pillars of EU Antitrust Law,
starting with Article 101 TFEU, moving on to EU merger control and
concluding the process with Article 102 TFEU. Its aim was to make EU
antitrust law more compatible with contemporary economic thinking.
On
the basis of an extensive empirical analysis of the Commission's main
enforcement tools, this book establishes the changes that the more
economic approach has made to the Commission's enforcement practice over
the past fifteen years. It demonstrates that the more economic
approach not only introduced modern economic assessment tools to the
Commission's analyses, but fundamentally changed the Commission's
interpretation of the law. Emulating one of the key credos of the US
Antitrust Revolution thirty years earlier, the Commission reinterpreted
the EU antitrust rules as aiming at the enhancement of economic consumer
welfare only, and amended its understanding of key legal concepts
accordingly.
This book argues that the Commission's new
understanding of the law has many benefits. Its key principles are
logical, translate well into workable legal concepts and promise a great
degree of accuracy. However, it also has a number of serious drawbacks
as it stands. Most worryingly, its revised interpretation of the law
is to large extents incompatible with the case law of the European Court
of Justice, which has not been swayed by the exclusive consumer welfare
aim. This situation is undesirable from the point of view of legal
certainty and the rule of law.
Table of contents
1. Triggers and Catalysts
2. The Process
3. The Agenda
Part II
4. A More Economic Objective
5. A More Economic Concept of Competitive Harm
6. A More Economic Concept of Countervailing Effects
7. A More Economic Test
8. A More Economic Methodology
Part III
9. Advantages
10. Compatibility with the Case Law
11. Other Concerns